Page 2 of 9 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 83

Thread: Caney Large Browns

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    160

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BlueRaiderFan View Post
    Some trout on the Caney must survive to reach the limits that they do.
    Yes, of course that's true. So maybe it would be fairest to divide up the trout stamp money by percentage of those want to eat trout vs those who want their sterile stockers to die of old age. I don't know what the actual percentages are, but you could divide up the river by who's money pays for more trout to be stocked. That seems fair. Although you would then have a big argument about who gets what stretch of river. Maybe it's just best for each side to continue to lobby and complain and about the other, which sorta keeps everything in a middle ground.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    160

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Plateau Angler View Post
    The Caney Fork brown trout will spawn and based off of last fall, they can do it successfully if we could just get some consistent low flows for a long enough period of time... The large browns would still be throughout the upper river if the majority weren't taken off of redds while they were vulnerable...
    If this or that... If the Caney had natural reproduction, it would be managed quite differently. I think it would be wonderful if they would manage the flows in such a way as to let reproduction happen. But you are describing a situation that does not exist. Not yet anyway. The question is currently just about deciding under what circumstances the stockers will die and be replaced with new stockers.

    I would love it if we are able to turn the Caney into something other than what it is. But it is what it is. We can change the regulations to suit a naturally reproducing fishery if it actually becomes that some day. Till then, regulations are only about how to make the most people happy with limited hatchery resources.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Crossville, TN
    Posts
    2,401

    Default

    If you bothered to actually fish the Caney or even look at it in the fall, you would know that there is at least some natural reproduction and would be more if people would leave the fish alone...
    "Then He said to them, 'Follow Me, and I will make you fishers of men.'" Matthew 4:19

    Guided Fly Fishing with David Knapp
    The Trout Zone Blog
    contact: TroutZoneAnglers at gmail dot com

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    East TN
    Posts
    533

    Default

    If the numbers are down it's from greed. Last fall on a website called tndeer.com in the fishing section a guy was posting the maps with all the spawning sections and how to fish them. He was obviously stupid and probably did alot of harm to the river by doing so. Needless to say he caught alot of grief over this. Did his stupidity and greed of others hurt the Caney, who knows.

    IF there were a lot of big fish harvested in the fall and the river is down, AND the baitfishermen and flyfishermen get together to complain, then maybe TWRA will see the the advantage of controlled harvest or closed sections during the spawn on the Caney as it should be. They close the S. Holston, and Arkansas closes the the White. Surely TWRA can the the advantages to closing a section during a spawn or even a false spawn. These fish are the most in danger of greed on the part of some "fishermen", whether it be from cooler fishermen to guys playing a big fish too long that dies in the end, or worst yet, those that practice snagging over fish on redds.
    I am a great admirer of spectator sports, especially on television; it keeps the riffraff off the trout streams.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    2,516

    Default

    I don't mind fihsermen keeping stockers. It's the larger fish that it would be nice to leave in the river. It would also be nice to leave the beds off limits during spawning season. They can repoduce under current conditions if left alone. No flow changes are neccessary. Some flow changes would be nice. If we had a catch and release section and left the fish alone during the spawn, people could keep some fish if they want and fly fishermen could catch more large fish. Both sides win. As far as who gets what section, any section of catch and release would be better than none. Just pick a half mile or so within 3-4 miles of the dam.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    2,516

    Default

    It's easy to make things difficult and compromises hard to reach, if one side decides they don't want to cooperate.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    160

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Plateau Angler View Post
    If you bothered to actually fish the Caney or even look at it in the fall, you would know that there is at least some natural reproduction and would be more if people would leave the fish alone...
    OK, OK, sorry to get you all ruffled. I did fish the Caney perhaps 50 times up until about 2000, when I decided that it seemed more like fishing at a trout farm and with no privacy. If others don't see it that way, then good for you.

    What I do know is that the TWRA considers trout reproduction in the Caney to be "extremely rare," and that trout must be stocked for there to be any in there. Combine that with the tons of pressure that it gets, I feel quite comfortable thinking that the amount of wild born fish in there is about zero. For any who want to understand why the TWRA has this view, you could look at this:

    http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&sourc...0d8rVJOVJPQktQ

    Just seeing some trout on redds doesn't mean anything. Most stocked trout will *try* to reproduce; it's the succeeding part that's hard. A nest full of fertilized eggs still isn't going to survive the winter and spring in the Caney. If you believe that your seeing trout on redds methodology is better than what the biologists come up with, I invite you to make your case.

    Getting back to the regs, if pretending that trout are successfully reproducing in there helps you to make your case that the fishing regs should change, then OK, that is your belief, and I encourage you to spread it to all that will hear.

    But I think maybe what you are really trying to say is that since yanking a stocker off a redd is so easy, that the benefit that the yanker gets from doing it is far less than the benefit you get from trying to fish for it over the following months (maybe years). That to me is a good argument. Maybe you are saying that you feel entitled to fish for large browns vs. Yanker Joe's entitlement to take large browns home to eat (small trout taste just as good or better). That also seems like a good argument. But in the end, it is not about natural reproduction; it is about making the most people happy with the stockers that the TWRA puts in there.

    If we are want to make trout reproduce naturally in the Caney, then we need to engage the entity responsible for that: The Corps of Engineers. If we then succeed at getting trout to reproduce naturally, we can then come up with correspondingly appropriate fishing regulations. That's all I'm trying to say.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Knoxville, TN
    Posts
    944

    Default

    Maybe they could start periodically checking people's licenses and stamps?


    After spending the past 2 weekends on the clinch, I can't believe there is any fish left in that river from the number of crowded stringers I saw.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    2,516

    Default

    Just having a catch and release section will allow the stocked fish to survive long enough to grow to a nice size.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Knoxville
    Posts
    1,168

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Grannyknot View Post
    Maybe they could start periodically checking people's licenses and stamps?


    After spending the past 2 weekends on the clinch, I can't believe there is any fish left in that river from the number of crowded stringers I saw.
    I will say it again. If TWRA would accept volunteers to patrol the rivers and issue citations, I would jump at the chance. I just had a co-worker tell me that he and his buddy went over there this past weekend and each caught a limit. He was even bragging about the 17" brown they had for dinner. And he is aware of the regs! We have talked about them many times.

    I am sure the same problem exists on the Caney as well.

Similar Threads

  1. Found 107 today - very large
    By Breck in forum In The Backcountry
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 04-15-2013, 01:32 PM
  2. large walleye
    By white95v6 in forum Tennessee Trout Streams and Tailwaters
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 11-06-2009, 02:09 AM
  3. 5 lb. Large mouth
    By Bran in forum Warmwater Fly Fishing
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 06-25-2008, 07:23 AM
  4. Pizza and Large Rainbow
    By Vern in forum Smoky Mountain Fishing
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 03-08-2007, 12:13 PM
  5. Awesome video of large Browns in Alberta
    By David Knapp in forum Fly Fishing for Trout in Other States
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 06-01-2006, 07:29 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •