Home Register Today's Posts Members User CP Calendar FAQ

Go Back   Little River Outfitters Forum > Fly Fishing Board > In The Backcountry

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-13-2013, 03:31 PM
Hoosier Hoosier is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 149
Default Thoughts on 21?

Can anyone offer thoughts on site 21? Only saw one opinion while looking at old reviews and it was not really a positive review. I would like to go to 24 but have two new folks going with me and was concerned that that may be a bit too far for them.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-13-2013, 06:35 PM
duckypaddler's Avatar
duckypaddler duckypaddler is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Knoxville, Tennessee
Posts: 1,146
Thumbs down

I think it sucks!
In fact any new campsite the park service will make in the future will suck. I'm all about LNT and trying to minimize impact, but think they have gone too far.
All new sites are clear away from water sources so the nasty campers won't contaminate the stream. Are all off the trail so you don't ruin the experience of day hikers having to look at campers while walking the trail. The park hires some Penn State LNT guru guy to build all the new campsites. Heard of the soup Nazi, this guy is a LNT Nazi

A buddy who has hiked all the trails and is now working at staying at all the campsites in the park assures me all the new ones are like that.

21 is Ok except that there aren't many tent sites that are even somewhat flat. Getting water requires you drop through the steep stuff that I sure wouldn't want my children or wife to do. It's also a bit exposed to the wind. I was all siked up to stay there till I actually did

Does give you good access to LR and is an easy hike

Just get your water on your way in before you hike the last .3

Sorry if I sound so grumpy in my remarks
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-13-2013, 08:34 PM
Hoosier Hoosier is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 149
Default

on't be sorry. I want the straight answer. Just was trying to find a good site reasonable for two new guys on that side of the park. I am personally a little tired of 18 and I worry about 24 being too far for their first trip. But I want to get them to a good site.

I appreciate your response. Thanks!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-14-2013, 04:35 PM
Rog 1's Avatar
Rog 1 Rog 1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Tallahassee, Florida
Posts: 872
Default

24 is only another mile and a half from there and it's a fairly easy walk.... A lot more fishing options from 24....you can start fishing right at the campsite and bag a slam without changing water.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-15-2013, 11:07 AM
Crockett Crockett is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Maryville, TN
Posts: 700
Default

I agree with these guys 21 is a terrible spot. I have stayed there and the whole site becomes basically a swamp when it rains. Luckily I had a hammock. It is too far from water source and the river. Not a great fishing base camp. 24 is much better. I am sure the NPS will phase out many of the good fishing sites like 24 eventually for the reasons ducky pointed out. I have also stayed at the new cs 46 over on Indian Creek on the NC side of the park and it is very similar to 21 not good.
__________________
Adam Beal

http://gosmokies.knoxnews.com/profil...=2hvzainc23h5b

Hey Jack (JAB)...
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-15-2013, 11:17 AM
Hoosier Hoosier is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 149
Default

Thanks! I apprecate the info. I will look at something else. I want to do 24 but it is probably too far for my son's buddies who have not been before. Probably will do 18 then.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:47 PM.



Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.