![]() |
|---|
![]() |
|---|
|
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
silvercreek-
Yes, it does work! Surprised me! I can see where it would "waterproof" a fly, I don't spray it too heavily though. My technique is more of several quick sprays to form a mist. I've made a dozen or so casts before I reapply the spray. For emergers, I cover the abdomen with my fingers, and spray the hackle. The hackle will float, and the abdomen hangs down in the water to mimic a real insect. I agree that it also acts as an "attractant" to the fish. And it sure is easy to use. Bill |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Thanks Kentucky. I may have to give it a try. Does it work on CDC?
__________________
"Here fishy fishy." |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Bill |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
If added scent is illegal on the streams your fishing, you might want to check the regs about what is considered floatant and what is considered scent. I know some guys that spray their carp flys with it for scent. Just saying. Don't want you guys ending up in jail in g-town.
Lynn |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I looked into that, and you are correct that in numerous states, an attractant is illegal. But, it appears that the regs are concerned with "fish scents" that on their own, are meant to attract fish. And I've found such fish scents at Bass Pro & others. Although it is assumed that WD-40 may attract fish, I don't think we can say that WD's sole purpose is to attract fish. Although it may sound like we're splitting hairs so to speak, the law does that, and I've never been "called" on that by a game warden. Bill |
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
Don't hurt to have your ducks in a row. Good to know. I fish alot of cdc. Gonna give it a try.
Lynn |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:34 PM. |