Home Register Today's Posts Members User CP Calendar FAQ

Go Back   Little River Outfitters Forum > Fly Fishing Board > Tennessee Trout Streams and Tailwaters

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-02-2012, 08:30 PM
Randy Ratliff Randy Ratliff is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Kingsport, Tennessee
Posts: 183
Default Thought this might be of interest.....

Thought this might be of interest to everyone...


"In USA today in the state blurbs "Tennessee: Nashville-Republican Sen. Lamar Alexander praised Interior Secretary Ken Salazar's decision to keep TN fish hatcheries at Erwin and Dale Hollow open until joint funding can be secured. Salazar told a Senate appropriations panel his agency is pursuing funding with TVA and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers."
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-03-2012, 07:57 AM
waterwolf waterwolf is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,202
Default

I would be stunned if TVA funded any part of a fish hatchery.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-03-2012, 08:15 AM
Corbo Corbo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Sevierville TN
Posts: 494
Default

Every time we buy fishing gear federal taxes exist on the products... we pay for these fish.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-03-2012, 10:23 AM
MadisonBoats's Avatar
MadisonBoats MadisonBoats is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Norris, TN
Posts: 1,884
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by waterwolf View Post
I would be stunned if TVA funded any part of a fish hatchery.
Yeah, they are on a tight noose right now with spending on direct projects. However; the secondary-level of spending=the big dark hole, is always hemorrhaging millions of dollars on indirect costs.

However; I guess one could construe that they are indirectly funding hatcheries on the few tail-waters that are self-sustaining in fish reproduction.
__________________
“Every human has four endowments- self awareness, conscience, independent will, & creative imagination.
These give us the ultimate human freedom... The
power
to choose, to respond, to change.”


Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-03-2012, 10:29 AM
waterwolf waterwolf is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,202
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Corbo View Post
Every time we buy fishing gear federal taxes exist on the products... we pay for these fish.
No we don't, our federal taxes are spent on a million things that are so far removed from fish they can't even see water. Such as huge entitlement programs, health care, stimulus plans, etc etc.

Just think how many fish could be stocked with the 800 billion dollars wasted on the 2009 Stimulus plan? Or how many fish weren't stocked because "someone" paid off their political buddies with money invested into their "green energy" companies which are now bankrupt.

Our federal tax dollars are wasted so badly it should be considered an atrocity by anyone who pays taxes.

I have said it before, and will again the federal govt has zero business raising fish. Last time I checked the constitution was missing a section dealing with fishery stocking.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-03-2012, 08:46 PM
Knothead Knothead is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: SE Tennessee
Posts: 644
Default

Quote:
Every time we buy fishing gear federal taxes exist on the products... we pay for these fish.
Corbo is correct. He is referring to the Wallop-Breaux Act which provides for a special tax on fishing tackle and related items. As a custom rodbuilder, I am required to collect a tax on each rod I build and pay the IRS. The money is then given to the USF&WS. Then, the money is distributed to the states in accordance to the number of fishing licenses sold.
Hunters also pay a tax on guns, ammo, archery, etc. as provided under the Pittman-Robertson Act. You can google these acts to see what they are.
Hunters and anglers are the only groups of people who actually asked to be taxed to keep their respective sports going.
When you get into general funds going for hunting and fishing, you are opening the door for the Anti's to stop our sports or redirect the money to other government programs. Believe me, they are out there!
__________________
John Torchick
http://www.hiwasseecustomrods.com
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-04-2012, 12:03 AM
waterwolf waterwolf is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,202
Default

Thanks for the educational lesson, I had never heard of the tax you mentioned.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-04-2012, 08:11 AM
Corbo Corbo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Sevierville TN
Posts: 494
Default

Waterwolf;

I totally agree with you and others that Federal Spending on PORK is totally out of control.

The Laws more properly described by Knothead were originally supposed to be dedicated revenues re-distributed to the States for the purpose of enhancing recreational values. Unfortunately it is easy to mis-direct these DEDICATED funds as they are easy money for the creeps who run our country.

BTW... a portion of gas tax (boats, atv's etc) also goes into this fund.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-04-2012, 08:17 AM
waterwolf waterwolf is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,202
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Corbo View Post
Waterwolf;

I totally agree with you and others that Federal Spending on PORK is totally out of control.

The Laws more properly described by Knothead were originally supposed to be dedicated revenues re-distributed to the States for the purpose of enhancing recreational values. Unfortunately it is easy to mis-direct these DEDICATED funds as they are easy money for the creeps who run our country.

BTW... a portion of gas tax (boats, atv's etc) also goes into this fund.
Agreed on the creeps in congress spending our money poorly, unfortunately the top of the pack is the absolute worst.

I had no clue that this fund was out there, good to know, and would be a good thing if the money if used as it is supposed to be used.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-04-2012, 05:14 PM
TN Jed's Avatar
TN Jed TN Jed is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 17
Default

Knothead:
I appreciate you posting the info on the Wallop-Breaux Act. I didn’t know about the Act; however, I was well aware of the Pittman-Robertson Act. Knothead, you’re right….the anti’s are out there….not to get off of the subject, but here’s an article I ran across yesterday….. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/46457440/ns/local_news-sacramento_ca/t/wildlife-official-under-fire-mountain-lion-hunt/
The article linked above leaves me shaking my head, but as you put it, a general fund would leave the door open for the anti’s. Personally, I’m quite thankful for the Acts mentioned above.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:22 PM.



Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.