Home Register Today's Posts Members User CP Calendar FAQ

Go Back   Little River Outfitters Forum > Fly Fishing Board > In The Backcountry

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-10-2012, 12:21 PM
mattblick's Avatar
mattblick mattblick is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Springboro, OH
Posts: 177
Default In need of suggestions..

Good morning,

I just called the backcountry office and found out 21 and 24 are filled up for this weekend. I'll be pouring over Fred's maps (and perhaps those inferior National Geographic ones as well) tonight, but thought I would enlist advice in case I am not considering trails I should be.

I'm going to be hiking in with my 63 year-old Father-In-Law Friday afternoon and out on Sunday. He is in good shape, but I am still hearing complaints about going over Baumgardner Mtn. to get him to site 58 in 2010.

I'm looking for a site ideally 5 or fewer miles from the trailhead. I have had bad experience at sites that allow horses in the past, but have been visited by bears that don't allow them recently, so maybe I should not rule them out anymore?

Any advice will be highly appreciated!
-Matt-
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-10-2012, 12:37 PM
Rog 1's Avatar
Rog 1 Rog 1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Tallahassee, Florida
Posts: 884
Default

Have you thought about BC 18 over by Tremont....not a long hike and a very pretty campsite....small water but there are fish to be had over there.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-10-2012, 01:32 PM
mattblick's Avatar
mattblick mattblick is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Springboro, OH
Posts: 177
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rog 1 View Post
Have you thought about BC 18 over by Tremont....not a long hike and a very pretty campsite....small water but there are fish to be had over there.
18 is a great site, thanks for the suggestion! I did 18 twice last year but haven't hit it yet this year, its on my short list.

Thanks again,
-Matt-
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-10-2012, 02:39 PM
David Knapp's Avatar
David Knapp David Knapp is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Crossville, TN
Posts: 2,200
Default

What about #60 over on Deep Creek? It is before you go over the ridge. #50 is not too far up the trail above Smokemont either...
__________________
"Then He said to them, 'Follow Me, and I will make you fishers of men.'" Matthew 4:19

http://thetroutzone.blogspot.com
http://www.troutzoneanglers.com
contact: TroutZoneAnglers at gmail dot com
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-10-2012, 02:41 PM
Drugcop4 Drugcop4 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Murphysboro, Illinois
Posts: 66
Default

Deep Creek is not bad if you don't go forever. If I remember right about 3-5 miles up near a trail crossing there was good campsites, and great stream access.

Small trail with big rocks that go up and down alot.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-10-2012, 04:05 PM
mattblick's Avatar
mattblick mattblick is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Springboro, OH
Posts: 177
Default

Thanks for the suggestions David and Drugcop!

Here is my question on both of those (50, 60):
I have avoided sites that allow horses in the park for at least the last 15 years. On one of my first trips in the park that wasn't on Elkmont, I stayed at a site that allowed horses. There were huge piles of horse dung where the horses had been tied up closer to the fire rings than they should have. To top that off previous users hadn't bothered picking up their trash even though they had horses to carry it. I carried out at least 5 pounds of garbage.

I may be unfairly prejudiced against horse sites, and perhaps have avoided them for too long.

When I walked past 60 last October the site was occupied by a nice group of anglers and I believe a guide/outfitter. There was a huge amount of gear that resembled what one would have in a campground instead of the "backcountry". The group was quite friendly and they talked about the fishing that day and the bear that sat 30 yards away watching them while they cooked and consumed their bacon. Is this the norm for 60? I fear since 21 and 24 are booked that 60 will be as well but I can try calling..

I have also always avoided Hazel because I believe the buggies might lead to the same situation.

I don't want to sound snobbish or elitist in my avoidance of this type of camping, in fact any time another person/group is at the same backcountry site as me I extend an offer to share my fire, whiskey, and cigars. At the same time I hike up carrying the necessities and eat freeze dried food to get away from the conveniences of a campground.

Should I give sites that allow horses another chance?

Thanks again and keep the suggestions coming! I might be able to talk tnflyfisher into hiking in and joining us Saturday evening. All this camping talk is certainly swaying him.

-Matt-
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-10-2012, 04:15 PM
tnflyfisher's Avatar
tnflyfisher tnflyfisher is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 311
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mattblick View Post
I might be able to talk tnflyfisher into hiking us Saturday evening. All this camping talk is certainly swaying him.
It definitely doesn't take much....
Fishing, mountains, maker's, cigars... yep, where do I sign?!?


Tight Lines,
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-10-2012, 07:53 PM
mattblick's Avatar
mattblick mattblick is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Springboro, OH
Posts: 177
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tnflyfisher View Post
It definitely doesn't take much....
Fishing, mountains, maker's, cigars... yep, where do I sign?!?


Tight Lines,
A request for Maker's? Have you had the new Maker's 46?

I was initially leaning towards bringing a new Whisky that my local store was limiting customers to 1 bottle; its called Tap 357 and is a Canadian Maple Rye Whiskey. But I have an unopened bottle of Maker's 46 in the cupboard as well..

-Matt-
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-10-2012, 09:03 PM
Drugcop4 Drugcop4 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Murphysboro, Illinois
Posts: 66
Default

The horse camp at Deep Creek (Cannot remember the number) was not bad when we were there in the Spring on 2011. There were some horse piles but not bad enough to make complaint. The trail did not appear to be used that heavily by horses as the pickets in camp were old and in disrepair. We passed several other sites along this trail that were very fishable and were good camp sites. I think we took some photos of the other sites if you want me to find them I can send them to you via email. Let me know if you want more info and I will pull out the map and the photos.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-10-2012, 09:05 PM
hauntedbywaters hauntedbywaters is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Asheville, NC
Posts: 5
Default

matt,

If you head to #60 this weekend you're likely to see me there. I've been camping and fishing DC backcountry for 10+ years, and I can say that I've never seen a bear at that first campsite. I cannot, however, say the same thing about hogs. Last time I was there they had torn the place up pretty good. That with the addition of a lot of trash left behind by others made the site look not so pretty.

Here's my take on DC. I've been fishing it since I was about 12 and it seems to me to have taken a decline in terms of fishing quality. I've noticed a lot of bigger fish missing that used to be there, as well as a lot of others fishing the creek. I'm not just talking about the first few miles, but also the deep backcountry (think campsite 53). This is more evident on weekends of course...

If you're trying to fish the NC side I would remind you #60 is maybe a 2.5 mile hike, that isn't so bad and you avoid Bumgardner Ridge. Only exception is a short but moderately steep hill before the first campsite. However, if you start fishing at that site you will have to either fish hard for 6+ hours or turn and walk the creek back, because the trail pulls away from the creek for a long while after #60 (I have seen bears back in here). An option is to camp there, walk down a mile or so, and fish back to #60.

If you don't mind horses, Noland Creek is another option, and makes for a pretty easy hike in/out.

I will also agree with David and suggest campsite #50 at Smokemont to fish Bradley Creek (the campsite, I believe, is on Chasteen Cr). It can't be more than 2.5 miles, and its a pretty easy hike if I remember.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:11 AM.



Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.