Home QLinks New Posts Members User CP Calendar FAQ

Go Back   Little River Outfitters Forum > Fly Fishing Board > Smoky Mountain Fishing

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-07-2008, 09:09 PM
lauxier lauxier is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: irvine ky
Posts: 418
Default technology again

have noticed a barrage of new advanced fly lines on the marketwhich one fits stream fishing best?--are they that advantageous as opposed to older lines?--am curious about "the shark" line,a hundred bucks for what?Are we getting too technical?What would a Smokies specific fly line,if marketed,be relative to other fly lines?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-08-2008, 08:58 AM
ccmmcc ccmmcc is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Upper Sandusky, OH
Posts: 126
Default

For the Smokies I use a neutral or dark colored fly line, Double Tapered. I'll bet that 90% of the time I don't have more than 8-10 feet of fly line outside the tip top of my rod. Mind you, I am not talking about tailwaters, or large pools on the lower end of Little River. I can't see paying 100 bucks for something that I only use a small portion of. That's what I like about a double tapered fly line; I can reverse it when one end gets cracked and dirty. Fly lines in the Smokies last me for years...

If a person is fishing waters that take long casts, then I can possibly see the benefits. I wonder if the "indentations" on the line collect grime and dirt?
__________________
Chris McCarthy

Many go fishing all of their lives without knowing that it is not fish they are after.
- Henry David Thoreau
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-08-2008, 07:04 PM
Plunker's Avatar
Plunker Plunker is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 292
Default Wondered the same thing CC

The fish scales would have to collect slime...

I guess this is opening the door for the "Shark Juice" Line cleaning system... avilable in two easy payments of $79.99 plus $30.00 shipping and handling(offer void where prohibited by law).

And they wonder why people look at Flyfishing as exclusionary! Granted; a Fly fisherman should be able to catch fish with the $19.99 Pfleuger starter kit (I have)...but it is a lot more fun to do it with style

Heaven knows you wouldn't want to give the trout any MORE reason to laugh at us.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-08-2008, 09:43 PM
monktrout's Avatar
monktrout monktrout is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 299
Default Style

I've heard it said,"For $100 you can catch fish. For $1000 you can have the look"
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-09-2008, 09:32 AM
D-Drake's Avatar
D-Drake D-Drake is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Maryville, Tennessee
Posts: 131
Default Shark Skin

I haven't fished with one of the new sharkskin lines yet, I've only cast it out in the backyard. That said...it really does cast well. The texture to the line causes less contact with the guides making less friction.
I have had the same thoughts about the texture attracting dirt and pond scum. Our SA sales rep, Park Burson, said that he was surprised that even casting the lines in parking lots (which kills lines very quickly) didn't seem to have much effect on how they cast. They are made from the same material that the other Scientific Angler lines are so they clean the same way with either soap and water or the SA Cleaning pads.

The people who I've sold the Sharkskin lines to love them. They report back that they shoot line great, float high, and mend easily. The Sharkskin is a perfect tailwater and big river line. You'll just have to give it a try.

Daniel
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:20 PM.



Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.